We Do Not Get to Choose
What Laws We Obey

By Rob Meyne

  • February 4, 2026
  • 3-min read

All of 49 states and their big city mayors are currently not encouraging demonstrators to interfere with police officers. They are the same states without deaths attributable to ICE encounters with protestors.

Texas and Florida, to name two, have had many more arrests and deportations of illegal immigrants with criminal records than Minnesota. In those states, there have been zero related violent encounters.

How can this be so? Simple: Texas and Florida are enforcing the law, working hand in hand with federal authorities, while Minnesota is not. Minnesota has anointed itself as a sanctuary state, and Minneapolis a sanctuary city. They have unilaterally decided they, and their citizens, don’t have to follow the law. Being a “sanctuary” from federal law is most notable because it is a thing that does not exist.

States and cities do not have the Constitutional authority to determine which laws they will follow. They might as well announce they are two-headed manatees as sanctuaries. It is just as true and just as legally binding.

“Sanctuary” is a made-up term, in the legal sense, and doesn’t exist in the U. S. You do not get to decide which laws you will obey. It doesn’t work that way.

Our federal laws are not the Golden Corral of politics; you don’t get to pick and choose. Calling a city a “sanctuary” tells us a lot about their priorities, but it doesn’t mean a thing in regard to the law.

Any time a person seeks out confrontation with law enforcement, harasses them, spits on them, damages their vehicles, swears at them, or otherwise interferes, bad things can happen. It is not a smart or legal thing to do.

There is no reasonable person, adult, parent, etc., who would advise a child in their care to interfere with police. Ever. Why is it reasonable for a governor or mayor to do?

Walz and Frey have openly encouraged people to interfere with law enforcement. And hundreds of thousands of dollars from far-left groups has been spent to equip and encourage the protestors. The resultant blood is on their hands. Not exclusively, but inarguably.

No reasonable person defends the killing of Pretti and Good. Their deaths were tragic and avoidable. That doesn’t make ICE agents hateful or the victims blameless.

None of us can put ourselves in the position of the officers on the front line. They take daily, consistent abuse and threats from citizens and politicians who call them the Gestapo and Nazis.

The issue in Minnesota is not free speech. No one is challenging the free speech rights of Minnesotans. They have a right to appear, to march, to chant, carry signs, and protest. I actually kind of like it when people protest. That is what freedom looks like. However, they do not have the right to physically confront police. Any rational person understands that.

People have said Pretti died because he was exercising his free speech. That is a lie, and the people who say that know they are lying.

This much is reasonable and ought to be ground on which we can unite:

  • The deaths in Minnesota are tragedies. We should all tone down our rhetoric, and all sides should work to prevent more deaths.

Free speech is our most important right and we must protect it.

No one has the right to interfere with law enforcement.

Citizens and public officials all have a duty to obey, respect, and support the law.

Anyone who can’t agree with those sensible principles has lost their right to a place at the table of rational debate.

The shootings in Minnesota are being investigated, as they should be. Looking ahead, we need reason and accountability from the protestors, the police, public officials, and everyone else. As long as Minnesota’s leaders continue to pretend they are above the law this situation will remain dangerous.

It is notable that the Trump Administration, and federal law enforcement, support all the above positions. The state of Minnesota, city of Minneapolis, anti-ICE protestors and their wealthy enablers do not. Who is being more reasonable?

Please share!

The Feds Closing In on George Soros’ Operations

By J Robert Smith

  • February 1, 2026
  • 2- min read

Clarice Feldman says this in her weekly roundup (February 1) of news at American Thinker.

In the U.S., attention to deportation protests, the search and seizure of the Fulton County, Georgia, election records, and the release of the thousands of documents in what are called the Epstein files are probably the key items of the week.

Minneapolis police (and now Los Angeles police) are cooperating with federal HHS officials as deportations continue.

Interestingly, the government signals it is going after the funders of the ICE riots. The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia announced the planned move:

“If money is quietly moving crowds in the streets, Jeanine Pirro says it’s time to treat it like organized crime.”– Jeanine Pirro moves to block George Soros from allegedly secretly bankrolling protests across America — by introducing a new bill that could classify such funding as organized crime under the RICO Act. If enacted, Soros-linked accounts could reportedly be frozen overnight, triggering a massive political shockwave nationwide and igniting fierce debate over protest financing, free speech, and national security. Soros should be behind bars!!

It is a key tactic of the administration to go after those who fund evil. They’ve done it internationally, by blocking the narco trade, the oil shipments from Iran and Venezuela, cutting off funds for the UN and the USAID slush fund. Domestic NGOs are also under scrutiny:

Kristi Noem goes nuclear as DHS chief, exposing how DEMS CREATED A SHADOW GOVERNMENT to sabotage the nation!

She says Democrats built a massive NGO web at home and overseas designed to weaken and overthrow America’s constitutional system.

It’s probably no coincidence that with the cutoff of funds to USAID and the increased scrutiny on NGOs, the DNC is in the red, and it will be even more starved for funds as the smurfing operation Act Blue is increasingly scrutinized.

We know the FBI searched and seized the Fulton County election materials, and we already knew before that the 315 thousand ballots in Georgia were illegally counted. There’s an FBI forensic lab on site reviewing the seized materials, and I think they will probably find a great deal to support the necessity of the SAVE Act pending in Congress, which is designed to limit the shenanigans that clearly occurred in Georgia and elsewhere in 2020.

If RICO laws prove applicable, Soros’ left-wing operations will grind to a halt. Drying up the money to left-wing street and other disruption operations is a killer. It’s been a shrewd under-the-radar play by the Trump administration to go after the money. This also means criminal prosecutions. Stay tuned.

To read Clarice Feldman’s article in full, click on this link.

Please share!

In Minnesota, Are Democrats Flirting with Insurrection?

By J Robert Smith

  • Jan. 16, 2026
  • 3-min read

Minnesota governor Tim Walz made a speech the other night claiming that ICE was brutalizing Minnesotans and occupying Minneapolis. He said he wants both to end. Democrats are all about narratives. In other words, concocting self-serving versions of events for highly personal or partisan reasons.

Walz has plenty to worry about. Not only is the massive Somali fraud that’s resulted in billions of federal taxpayer money stolen costing him his reelection bid, but the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating Walz and other Minnesota Democrat officials to determine if they’re culpable in any way.

Walz is trying to distract from his troubles. Moreover, immigrant populations – illegal or legal – have become the lifeblood of the Democrat Party. Though Minnesota is a Democrat state, it’s lighter blue. Republicans control the state house. A capable GOP candidate for statewide office can usually count on a vote tally in the high 40-percent range. That makes Republicans competitive. Democrats need the Somali voting bloc to help keep their grip on statewide offices. Walz is protecting an important bloc in his party’s voting base. He’s happy to overlook crime among Somalis.

Then there’s Jacob Frey, the mayor of Minneapolis, who famously told ICE to get the f**k out of Minneapolis. Understand that ICE isn’t causing any problems in Frey’s city. They’re rooting out and arresting Somali criminals, among others.

In Florida, for example, ICE is working closely with state and local law enforcement to quietly and successfully roundup hardcore criminals among illegals – and, yes, arrest and deport those who are in the U.S. illegally. Florida governor Ron DeSantis is seeing to it.

Per a Grok (X platform) search and analysis:

ICE’s Operation Metro Surge, launched in late 2025 in Minneapolis, has resulted in over 2,000 arrests nationwide, with a focus on the Twin Cities area due to its sanctuary policies. Among those arrested are individuals from various countries, including Somalia, prioritized for criminal convictions or outstanding deportation orders. DHS and ICE have publicly highlighted the “worst of the worst” cases, emphasizing arrests of those convicted of serious crimes like homicide, sexual assault, child abuse, drug trafficking, and fraud. Of the 212 individuals classified as the most dangerous in Minnesota operations, 20 are from Somalia (about 10%), behind Mexico (91) and Honduras (22). Nationwide, 117 people with Somali citizenship were arrested in the initial phase, with 28 in Minnesota.

Walz, Frey, and Minnesota attorney general Keith Ellison have been careful about not calling for outright resistance to federal law enforcement. That would be insurrection. Though they couch their words, their actions indicate attempts at public incitement. They’ve withheld not only state and local law enforcement cooperation with ICE, but have allowed rabble to run Minneapolis’ streets – as in individuals who are committing acts of violence toward federal law enforcement and property destruction. We’re not talking about peaceful, lawful protests, which are a 1st Amendment right.

President Trump is walking a tightrope. Lately, polling suggests that independent voters and moderates are backing off supporting his immigration enforcement efforts. Republicans aren’t, however. The midterm elections are critically important. Republicans holding Congress matters to the final two years of Trump’s term. If enough independents are motivated to vote against Republican House and Senate candidates this autumn, that makes Trump a 24-month lame duck.

Yet, upholding the law matters greatly. Somalis shouldn’t be given passes, having committed fraud on an historic scale. Drug dealers, gangbangers, rapists, child sex traffickers, fraudsters, and thieves, among others, need to be brought to justice. Those here illegally need to be deported.

Perhaps Trump’s solution is to pursue justice and work like hell to get Republicans to the polls this autumn? Perhaps, leadership, resolve, and fighting for a safer America and justice wins votes?

Please share!

Our Civilization is At Risk. Are You Up for the Fight?

By Rob Meyne

  • Jan. 2, 2026
  • 5-min read

Every generation, back to the days when we celebrated holidays with families over a slice of roasted mammoth, had concerns about the future of our families, friends, and communities. It is human nature to be concerned, even when communities consisted of only a dozen people.

It is also normal to think the problems we are facing are the worst ever. Every generation has faced its challenges, and they were all important, immediate, and impactful.

It is nonetheless true that the problems and opportunities we face are unprecedented or, at best, more pervasive and potentially impactful than ever before.

If mankind survives another couple of centuries (not a certainty) it will be largely because we figured out how to handle bigger challenges. Only the most optimistic of use think we are on track to do so.

Some of the issues that will determine our future, and which we still have a chance to affect, include:

• Education – Our system is failing, despite some good people and good intentions. It would not be an overreaction to scrap the whole thing and start from scratch, emphasizing basics until they are mastered. There is no evidence we have the will to do that.

• Freedom – Free speech, capitalism (which has lifted billions out of poverty in the past half century) and self-government are under attack. The last administration had extensive efforts to censor legacy and social media. President Trump has ended the biggest digital censorship programs from Obama and Biden, and our law enforcement agencies are no longer pressuring social and legacy media to spike stories that go against the “narrative.”

Astonishingly, millions of average voters and Dem leaders think we have too much free speech. Freedom is being restricted in much of Europe, too, especially Germany and the U. K. Donald Trump is constantly accused of being a fascist. Yet the evidence proves otherwise. He has pushed to enforce immigration laws – federal law – and that is offered as proof he is a dictator. A president supporting the law is the opposite of dictatorship. A president ignoring law, as did Biden, is more fascist by far. Bottom line: President Trump publicly advocates for more freedom. Not a single leading Democrat does. Just the facts, ma’am!

• Political Parties – Both major parties have evolved, but the Democrats have changed more than the Republicans. Although a lot of former GOPs don’t like Trump, his policies are generally conservative with some being surprisingly moderate. For the Democrats, the nascent cohort is socialist/communist candidates, elected officials, party leaders, and a majority of their actual voters, who favor socialism over capitalism, according to their own responses to national surveys.

• AI – Artificial Intelligence has gotten so good that it is now very difficult to determine whether a picture or video is real. And it controls a lot of our basic organizational and governmental processes.

AI makes us question every story or message from the media. And, rather than being objective, we have seen that AI bears the same prejudices and political leanings as the people and information that inform it. AI is also, sadly, the go-to way for students to get through school, getting passing grades without earning them. A famous article the past year, written by a student, outlined how most Yale Undergrads relied on AI to do most of their work. And their average grade is an A. We are in trouble.

• Demographics – Our population is growing older, and we are not having children at even a replacement rate. Younger women are abstaining from marriage or being mothers, while a ton of young men are sequestered in their parent’s home or behind a video game console in their own place.

Astounding numbers of people don’t even have social lives, and perhaps most surprising, are giving up entirely on sex. This is not a positive comment on our nation or our future. Our founders expected us to be informed, engaged, social, collegial, and active in politics. Manifestly, today, we are not.

• Media – Mainstream media continue to be overwhelmingly leftist, as do our major universities. Perfectly factual stories like Hunter’s laptop got intentionally killed, or spiked, by a combination of pressure from the FBI and other governmental agencies. There are a handful of moderate or conservative outlets, but most corporate media don’t even pretend to be objective anymore.

• Illegal Immigration – We have also seen an unimaginable influx of foreigners into our nation, which creates pressure on housing, jobs, social services, schools, and more. This was the result of a conscious decision by the previous president to ignore our laws. For today, President Trump has secured our borders, but many others support the influx of non-citizens. Either way, it will have an impact on our nation for centuries to come.

So, what is the path forward? It is up to us.

The people who define our future will be the ones who make the effort to be well—informed, care enough to do something about it, and realize we are in a fight for our civilization. If you don’t get that, by now, you probably never will. As for me? I’m going down swinging. If we lose the fight for freedom, self-government, and western values it will not be because I sat this one out. How about you?

Please share!

Yes, the 2020 Election Was Corrupt, but No One Seems to Care

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 29, 2025
  • 3-min read

Last week, Fulton Country, GA, admitted that more than 300,000 illegal ballots were counted there in 2020. More than enough to have changed the outcome, and there is no reason to think it only happened in GA.

The careful observer will recall that the entire post-election period in 2020 was a discussion between people who thought the results were inaccurate and corrupt, mostly Trump supporters, and those who thought you were insane if you even asked questions about it.

Notably, even the key players in Georgia, including Governor Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensburger, protested non-stop that there were no irregularities in Georgia, the count was accurate, and suggesting anything else was tantamount to treason. They supported the anti-Trumpers from day one, and still seem to.

Four years later, Georgia authorities have finally admitted they were wrong, people like me were right (pardon the attitude there), and of course so was Trump.

Four years hence, there is nothing we can do about it. Almost none of the people who think questioning the election was wrong will acknowledge “we” were right, apologize for it, or suggest ways to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

In other words, the anti-Trumpers were wrong, Trump was right, and no one will let it change the way they spew hatred against the people they disagree with.

It is sad that proof of corruption in the election is not enough to unify us around a commitment to do better next time. Not one Democrat leader is advocating for more secure elections. Not. One. They claim any effort to secure our elections is rooted in racism or other inaccurate claims.

Why? Because corruption benefits them. There is no other explanation. Why else would a person oppose making elections secure?

The 2020 election, which Biden is said to have won, was corrupt. Votes were counted that were not legally cast and processed. Period. We know that. It is not an opinion. Secretary of State Raffensburger can claim it doesn’t matter, the law shouldn’t be enforced, or that he is from the planet Neptune, for that matter. None of those things is true.

It is an embarrassment when elected officials of either/both parties push back against making sure votes are cast and counted legally. If we lose that, there is no hope for our future.

A constitutional republic, and democratic values, require our citizens and officials to be informed, reasonable, and open to different opinions. Yet we no longer meet those criteria.

Logical thinking, reasoning, and civil debate REQUIRES us to learn, examine, and improve. We need facts, not opinions. And no one in authority has objectively looked at the legal issues from the 2020 election. No one has even investigated it. In the meantime, we are supposed to think a man who didn’t leave his basement to campaign got 81 million votes, about six million more than the previous record. Impossible.

The paucity of leaders who are willing to discuss this issue is not a minor problem. It threatens the very future of our nation.

Please share!

AI Reflects the Bias of Its Creators

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 6, 2025
  • 3-min read

As Artificial Intelligence controls more of our lives every day, it is disturbing to realize it is being developed to reflect certain prejudices and biases.

You cannot trust it, and I am not sure ultimately there is anything we can do about it. Figuring out what is true will get even harder in the future. It is tough enough already. But in days to come, we will have to be even more dedicated to discerning fact from opinion.

Recently I have been using, and experimenting with, Grok. Not Gronk. He was the tight end. Grok.

I was curious to see if it is biased, politically, and of course found that it is.

I asked it to give me a list of the payments members of the Biden family have received from foreign governments, individuals, and companies. Just a list. Just the facts, ma’am. 😊

Grok responded with a document under the banner of “… alleged payments…” they have received. Then when on to list them. For those watching at home, it was in the ten of millions.

Yet, the question, and the bias it reveals: why did it call them “alleged” when the payments are clearly and carefully documented, by the banks themselves, who reported them to the Treasury?

Following me? A list of proven payments (in exchange for no work, by the way) to Joe’s family. Even grandkids and in-laws. Fully documented. But Grok called them “alleged,” suggesting it isn’t true and creating doubt.

When queried further, Grok told me they use the word “alleged” not to question the payments themselves but to address the accusations of criminality that usually accompany it. But they called the payments themselves alleged.

And I hadn’t shown any interest in criminal charges or theories. Grok just assumed if I was asking about payments to the Bidens what I was really after is fodder for criminal accusations. Just looking for numbers and sources resulted in politically biased outputs.

They called the payments “alleged” even though they admitted in a later exchange there is no doubt the payments occurred.

It also recommended, unsolicited, that I ask for a list of Trump family business connections to other nations. I also didn’t ask about this.

Got it? They are doing everything they can to make it look like the Biden activities are basically the same as those of the Trump family.

Except, one, no one asked. (I also didn’t ask about the life cycle of the common shrew.)

And, two, the Trump family has a BUSINESS that involves real work, real property, employees, and sales worldwide. Grok suggests an equivalency between the Trump businesses and the Biden payoffs. But the Bidens have no actual businesses, investments, employees, products, services, or sales. They just have a series of LLCs, shell companies that take payments but have to real business.

There is a reason the name Trump appears on buildings, and the name Biden does not.

Artificial Intelligence reflects the biases of the people who develop it and the information from which they learn. It should not surprise us that AI output is flawed.

You may recall that Biden’s proposed regulations on AI mandated that it promote equity, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity. Equity benefits certain races and disadvantages others. Biden’s team built their own ideological and political prejudices into their AI regulations.

Many tech companies, their leaders, and their funders do the same. Finding the truth is getting harder as a result.

Please share!

Senate Republicans Better End the Filibuster

The nation just experienced an historically long federal government shutdown. It cost Americans billions of dollars, disrupted services, and ended without any tangible results for the Democrats, who forced it.

President Trump has called repeatedly for Senate Majority Leader John Thune and the GOP caucus to end the filibuster. The president wants his agenda acted on swiftly, and for the sake of the nation, he’s right. Yet, a dozen-plus Republicans have balked. They’ve balked because they’re living with the old politics – the old ways of operating the Senate. But the old politics are dead.

When Democrats had a majority in 2021, they came within a hair of ending the filibuster. But for the efforts of former Democrat senators Joe Manchin (WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (AZ), they would have opened the dam to radical changes impacting our election system, economy, and much else. Manchin and Sinema were practically run out of their offices by their fellow Democrats. The next time Democrats control the Senate – and that could be as soon as 2027, following the midterm elections – they’ll move to abolish the filibuster. They’ll push a far more radical agenda because the energy is on the left.

Then what? Then they’ll renew the push to enact their 2021 agenda and worse. Back then, House Democrats passed the “For the People Act.” Had this radical measure passed the Senate, it would have “expanded early voting, automatic voter registration, restored voting rights to felons, limited gerrymandering, and imposed new disclosure rules on campaign donations.”

That was for starters. One more example. The “Build Back Better Act” was a gargantuan $3.5 trillion spending measure that “included universal pre-K, expanded Medicare benefits (dental, vision, hearing), paid family leave, child tax credit expansion, housing aid, and clean energy investments. A full version required filibuster elimination, as it exceeded reconciliation limits; a scaled-back iteration passed in 2022 as the Inflation Reduction Act.” Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act spent money on an economic stimulus that wasn’t needed. It caused the inflation that stripped Americans of their buying power. It was a disaster enough.

This nation is at a crossroads. President Trump has a small window to reset the country’s course. We have a chance to be a more prosperous, freer, and decent society or we can spin off into the dystopian world that Democrats and the left are striving to create. Open borders will return, police will be prevented from doing their jobs, and Uncle Sam will spend us into a bona fide fiscal crisis. And expect limits on free speech the likes we’ve never seen on these shores.

Is all that an exaggeration? Not a bit, unless like Senate Republicans, you want to deny that only two maverick Senate Democrats in 2021 staved off ending the filibuster, thereby protecting the country from woes most of us can’t imagine. Republicans need to end the filibuster before the Democrats do to enact measures that set the nation on a healthier course.

President Trump is right. The next time, Senate Democrats won’t fire and miss.

Please share!

Incredibly Awful Virginia Democrats are Winning Their Races

By J Robert Smith

  • Oct. 10, 2025
  • 3-min read

Abigail Spanberger is the Democrat nominee to be Virginia’s next governor. She can’t even answer a simple question: “Should males be allowed in female restrooms and locker rooms?” She won’t give a straight answer when she’s asked because if she says, No,” LGBTQ+ activists will turn on her. Their money will dry up. Northern Virginia’s affluent, progressive whites might walk away.

On the other hand, if Spanberger says, “Yes,” then the large middle of Virginia voters might go for Winsome Earle-Sears, Virginia’s current lieutenant governor. Earle-Sears has made it crystal clear that males don’t belong in female restrooms and locker rooms.

Here’s Spanberger weaseling out of answering the restroom question in last Thursday night’s debate with Earle-Sears:

Spanberger also said that her voters need to be fueled by rage. This is her idea of trying to motivate the Democrat base to vote? It’s an odd choice of words in light of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Here’s the Merriam Webster Dictionary definition of rage:

a: violent and uncontrolled anger
b: a fit of violent wrath
c: archaic : insanity

Virginia really wants a governor who is calling for her voters to stoke their anger to the point of… rage? Spanberger isn’t dumb. She knows what rage means. It was no slip of the tongue, either. She believes that her voters need to work themselves up into a frothing anger. Where does uncontrolled anger lead?

Real Clear Politics has Spanberger running ahead of Earle-Sears by an average of seven points. That’s outside the margin or error. Balloting has been underway since September 19, so a lot of votes have been cast. There’s still three weeks before the November 4 election deadline, so Earle-Sears could gain ground and win. But it would be a squeaker.

Then there’s Jay Jones, the Democrat nominee for attorney general. National Review surfaced text messages from a few years ago. When Jones was a state delegate, he messaged a colleague about the GOP Speaker of the House, saying “[Speaker Todd] Gilbert, hitler, and pol pot, [sic]” Jones wrote. [Who gets the bullets?] “Gilbert gets two bullets to the head.”

Jones fantasizing about killing Gilbert wasn’t satisfying enough. He then stated he wished the speaker’s children would die in their mother’s arms.

Jones’ campaign has taken a hit, but even after those messages were revealed, he’s still leading incumbent GOP attorney general Jason Miyares by a point in a recent poll. Jones appears to be tanking, but a lead is still a lead. His support should have cratered. Yet, it’s a good bet that Miyares overtakes Jones. Whether or not that hurts Spanberger’s candidacy is the key question.

Neither Spanberger nor any other prominent Virginia Democrat has called for Jones to drop out. If there was ever a case where decency overrides partisanship, its Jay Jones’ candidacy. Yet, Democrats remain silent. What does that tell us?

It tells us that Democrats have a decency problem. Their lust for power is greater than their willingness to call out one of their own for outright violent and ghoulish intentions.

If you’re a Virginia voter, keep that in mind.

Please share!

James Comey Had It Coming

By J Robert Smith

  • Sept. 27, 2025
  • 2-min read

Bill Maher has decided that James Comey’s indictment is just Donald Trump’s revenge. That’s what Maher said on Friday night’s show. Actually, Maher isn’t original here. That’s the party line among Democrats. That’s certainly the line from corporate media. So, he’s just regurgitating with zingers and laugh lines.(For the record, Maher can be very funny. If I can’t catch his show, I’ll watch clips at X.) But he whiffs in the humor department here.

Catherine Herridge, now an independent journalist and one of the few good ones, posted at X on September 25:

“• Revealed Comey’s role authorizing media leaks (at least one involved classified information) through his FBI subordinates or through his Columbia law school professor Richman with SGE (Special Government Employee) status.”

Revolver cuts to the chase (September 26):

“The [Kash Patel led] FBI’s declassified investigation tied Comey directly to media leaks, including classified information he funneled through lower-level FBI officials, and even through his Columbia professor buddy. That professor should be facing charges too, unless he’s cutting a deal to save his own skin.”

Revolver summarizes:

“So no, this wasn’t a witch hunt. It was a long-running cover-up that finally collapsed like a house of flimsy cards. Comey thought he had all his bases covered, even planting family in key positions to shield him. But like every crooked scheme, it was only a matter of time before it all came crashing down.”

Wonder why a Comey indictment is only happening now? Revolver cites an X Post by Hans Mahncke (September 25):

“Then I learned that the now former U.S. Attorney, Erik Siebert (Eastern District of Virginia], was a Democratic Party backed pawn, which made the picture a little clearer. Next, I found out that Siebert’s deputy was tied to Trump saboteur Lisa Monaco, confirming the rot. But the biggest shock was discovering that James Comey’s own son-in-law worked there until today.”

Hence, President Trump’s insistence that Attorney General Pam Bondi get off her rump and hand Siebert his walking papers. Siebert was replaced with Lindsey Halligan, who was an attorney defending Trump in the ginned up Mar-a-Lago classified documents case. She was serving in Trump’s administration. Democrats are howling that Halligan is merely a water-carrier for Trump. More nonsense. First, U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. Trump, like his predecessors, has the power to hire and fire.

Second, to put it charitably, Siebert was clearly “conflicted.” If there was anyone carrying water, it was Erik Siebert, hence, the endless delay indicting Comey.

There’s talk that more indictments are headed Comey’s way. What role did Comey play in attempts to frame Trump with Russia collusion? Indications are that then-President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton originated that scheme. How was Comey in the mix? We may find out shortly.

Prediction: James Comey is an oily DC insider. Like most players in that town, he’s all about looking out for Number One. If he doesn’t think he can beat raps in a court of law – if he doesn’t get the level of political cover and financial backing he needs to pay legal fees – he may decide to cut a deal with prosecutors to save himself with a plea deal. If it comes to that, that may prove bad news for others involved in the worse conspiracy to destroy a president in U.S. history.

Please share!

Do We Have the Courage to Save America?

By Rob Meyne

  • Sept. 19, 2025
  • 3-min read

Last week was an inflection point in U.S. history. I cannot say how the world will be different now, but I am confident it will.

Those who are familiar with Charlie Kirk’s work and words likely understand the importance of his assassination. The people who do not understand are his political opponents, ideological enemies, or those whose knowledge of him is limited to lies they have heard.

We will have more to say on this and related topics in the days to come. For now, let me ask you to consider one lesson we should learn.
His assassination proves there is one thing the left fears more than anything else: constitutional conservative Christians who can have respectful conversations with people who hold different opinions. We are feared because we are effective.

When people know the facts, and are open to a respectful discussion, minds can be changed. The left fears good will, kindness, and facts more than anything. Most of their political arguments are based on emotion and inaccurate assumptions. Their discussions don’t usually hold up under the light of truth.

Survey data repeatedly show the majority of Americans believe in conservative principles like those generally held by Kirk. Most Americans support reducing the size of government, lower taxes, respectful dialogue, secure borders, the welcoming of immigrants who come here lawfully, and don’t approve of grown men showering with their daughters. And he was a proud Christian and an effective apostle. For that he is accused of being an extremist.

The left fears conservative activists who are willing and able to debate the issues of our day in a way that is open, respectful, and successful. They are not worried about the most extreme, fringe conservative activists.

Charlie Kirk is not dead because he was extreme. He was not. Or because he was hateful. He was not. Charlie is dead because he was successful. He brought thousands of young Americans to understand and support our Constitution, nation, the value of the family, and the love of the Lord. Those are the things for which Charlie Kirk lived and died. Any time you want to know who is being effective, and who radical leftists fear the most, look at who they attack. That will tell you everything.

In a presidential campaign, your opponents will tell you where they fear they will lose. Just look at where they are spending their time and money. By the same reasoning, they will tell you who they think is hurting them in the political world. The people who are hurting them are the ones they attack. That simple.

In the case of Kirk, he was such a threat to the leftists that he was murdered. If that doesn’t tell you everything you need to know, you are beyond saving.

What should be our response? Be more like Charlie. We can change this world for the better, starting right now, if we commit to being unafraid to express our opinions, to debate in a way that is civil, factual, and persuasive, and to be willing to listen.

If every conservative patriot woke up tomorrow and did just that, we would change the political future of America, inexorably and positively.
How many of us have the courage to do that?

Please share!